Rethinking power in world politics: the empowering potential of media monitoring and gender-based advocacy networks
![](/channels/files/channels/styles/fullwidth_breakpoints_theme_moriarty_small_1x/public/channels/image/115106_claudia_padovani.jpg?itok=N0PqNHN5×tamp=1346679177)
Media@9I制作厂免费 and the 9I制作厂免费 Institute for Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies (IGSF) invite you to a talk by Claudia Padovani, a researcher and senior lecturer in Political Science and International Relations at the Department of Historical and Political Studies, University of Padova (Italy).
Abstract: Reflections on the Global Media Monitoring Project
In my talk I would like to propose a way of looking at power and
influence in the world politics of communication that focuses on
the nexus between media research, transnational communication
advocacy and high level policy making. I shall do this by
inductively starting from a specific project - the Global Media
Monitoring Project (GMMP) - and will proceed discussing the
empowering potential of a chain of practices that connects
knowledge production to discourses and norms formation which (may)
end up informing actual policy making.
I adopt here a broad understanding of Global Communication
Governance (Padovani & Pavan 2010; Raboy & Padovani 2010),
one that acknowledges the interplay amongst different actors and
modes of intervention, at different levels with different outcomes,
including cognitive and normative developments. Such understanding
invites a revision of the concepts of power and influence in the
global context; and calls for adequate, and often multi-dimensional
approaches, if we are to fully appreciate the elements that
contribute to governing the global, including global
communication.
I therefore suggest it becomes crucial to investigate the nexus
between three elements: a) the role of expert knowledge and
epistemic communities and the potential of empirically viable
research activities as resources for policy making; b) the
practices, repertoires and outcomes of transnational advocacy
networks, with a special attention for their framing of issues and
discursive interventions; and finally c) the possibility for
research results and normative-oriented discursive practices, to
develop into statements that may inform and orientate global
decision making.
I think the Global Media Monitoring Project offers an amazing
opportunity to look into these dynamics, while possibly resonating
to a diversified audience: from gender aware individuals and
groups, to students interested in the methodologies of the project,
to people with a specific interest for media reform and
communication rights activism from the local to the transnational
level, to scholars who share concerns about the future orientation
of global governance.