BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4//
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20250312T173157EDT-1033Z5u9LV@132.216.98.100
DTSTAMP:20250312T213157Z
DESCRIPTION:With Justice Patrick Healy (Court of Appeal of Quebec) Professo
 r Julian Roberts (University of Oxford) Dean Marie-Eve Sylvestre (Universi
 ty of Ottawa) moderated by Professor Marie Manikis (9IÖÆ×÷³§Ãâ·Ñ)\n\n
 (En anglais seulement) Appellate review has been the principal mechanism o
 f guidance in Canada for sentencing judges. Yet other models have been dev
 eloped and implemented in other jurisdictions. This panel considers two al
 ternative models: the traditional appellate review approach and guidance i
 ssued by an independent statutory authority – a Sentencing Commission. The
 re will be three presentations followed by general discussion. Justice Hea
 ly will explore the role of the appellate courts at sentencing in Canada\,
  with particular emphasis on the standard of review and the level of guida
 nce. Professor Roberts will then discuss the alternative approach which ha
 s been adopted in England and Wales and several other common law jurisdict
 ions. The Sentencing Council of England and Wales has issued offence-speci
 fic guidelines and guidelines addressing issues of relevance to all cases\
 , including sentence reductions for a guilty plea. Dean Sylvestre will the
 n explore the impact of both models on the sentencing of marginalized popu
 lations in Canada and the ability of the judiciary to innovate\n
DTSTART:20230306T223000Z
DTEND:20230306T234500Z
LOCATION:9IÖÆ×÷³§Ãâ·Ñ Faculty of Law\, Maxwell Cohen Moot Court (NCDH 100)
SUMMARY:Annual Proulx Roundtable - Sentencing in Canada: Do Canadian courts
  have sufficient guidance?
URL:/law/fr/channels/event/annual-proulx-roundtable-se
 ntencing-canada-do-canadian-courts-have-sufficient-guidance-345700
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR